
CAPABILITY //
“V3” Value Modelling for Technology Decisions in Mining

Dr Erik Isokangas
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
STATUS
IN PROGRESS / TRL5
Heading 2
Challenge
Introducing new technology into an operating mine is inherently complex. Promising innovations often affect multiple parts of the value chain at once; productivity, energy use, infrastructure, operating costs and capital spend, making it difficult to understand their true business value. Traditional feasibility studies and spreadsheet‑based models typically assess these impacts in isolation, increasing the risk of overlooking system‑level effects and unintended consequences.
Solution
To address this challenge, we developed “V3”, a flexible value modelling and simulation toolkit designed specifically for mining applications. V3 integrates detailed operational simulation with a transparent, life‑of‑mine value model to quantify how new technologies influence mine performance and economic outcomes as a whole. Operational inputs such as equipment capacity, utilisation, energy demand, queuing and downtime are progressively linked to high‑level financial metrics including cost per tonne, cash flow and net present value.
The toolkit is modular by design, allowing users to rapidly configure and compare multiple technology scenarios within the same mine context. Instead of relying on single-point assumptions, V3 supports sensitivity, attribution and scenario analyses, making the drivers of value and risk explicit. This enables mine owners, operators and technology developers to understand not only whether a technology adds value, but why and under what conditions.
A key example of V3 in action is the Hydra project, where the toolkit was used to assess hydrogen fuel‑cell and battery‑hybrid haulage systems in comparison with conventional diesel and battery‑only alternatives. V3 enabled a structured evaluation of productivity impacts, energy requirements, infrastructure needs and life‑of‑mine economics, providing a robust business‑case framework to support technology development and investment decisions.
Another example is GESim, Mining3’s Grade Engineering simulation model, which applies the same V3-style approach to evaluate how grade-engineering strategies affect operational performance and value capture. By simulating mining, material movement, stockpiling, processing steps, delays and ore characteristics such as grade and size, GESim helps operators test short-term grade-engineering plans, identify bottlenecks and understand whether proposed strategies will deliver practical value under real operating conditions.
Benefits of V3 include:
Holistic, whole‑of‑mine assessment of new technologies
Transparent linkage between operational performance and economic outcomes
Rapid comparison of alternative scenarios and design options
Clear insight into value drivers, trade‑offs, and sensitivities
Reduced risk in technology investment and deployment decisions
By turning complex operational interactions into clear, decision‑ready insights, V3 helps the mining industry move from intuition‑led technology trials to evidence‑based, value‑focused implementation.
RELEVANT RESOURCES:

